Login Paper Search My Schedule Paper Index Help

My ICIP 2021 Schedule

Note: Your custom schedule will not be saved unless you create a new account or login to an existing account.
  1. Create a login based on your email (takes less than one minute)
  2. Perform 'Paper Search'
  3. Select papers that you desire to save in your personalized schedule
  4. Click on 'My Schedule' to see the current list of selected papers
  5. Click on 'Printable Version' to create a separate window suitable for printing (the header and menu will appear, but will not actually print)

Paper Detail

Paper IDCOM-3.9
Paper Title A FUZZY-BASED ADAPTATION CONTROLLER FOR LOW LATENCY LIVE VIDEO STREAMING
Authors Yunlong Li, Peking University, China; Xinfeng Zhang, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Shanshe Wang, Siwei Ma, Peking Universiy, China
SessionCOM-3: Image and Video Communications
LocationArea H
Session Time:Tuesday, 21 September, 13:30 - 15:00
Presentation Time:Tuesday, 21 September, 13:30 - 15:00
Presentation Poster
Topic Image and Video Communications: Image & video multimedia communications
IEEE Xplore Open Preview  Click here to view in IEEE Xplore
Abstract HTTP adaptive streaming with chunked transfer encoding can provide low latency live video streaming experience. However, providing high and smooth quality video streaming experience under low latency conditions poses a great challenge for Adaptive BitRate (ABR) algorithm design due to the shorter time to react to bandwidth fluctuations. To address the problem, we design a Fuzzy logic controller based ABR for low latency live video streaming with Chunked Transfer Encoding (FCTE). We take player buffer size, throughput mean, and throughput standard deviation as inputs to make bitrate decisions. By making full use of network information and dealing with uncertainties using fuzzy language, FCTE can make quick and robust bitrate decisions in the complicated network environment. We evaluate FCTE over five network scenarios released by Twitch. FCTE achieves average QoE improvement by 129%, 338%, and 127% compared with three representative algorithms: L2A, LoL, and Stallion, respectively